Government Neutral Reporting Agency or Vigilante Bully Reporting For Who?
Understanding various 501(c)s ubiquitous role serving social welfare. The current vigilante actions a few IRS civil servants undermines public government confidence and legal authority of the Internal Revenue Service. The Internal Revenue Service coveted "untouchable" integrity upon corruption of acclaimed 1930's organized crime boss Al Capone. Capone despite numerous hideous criminal activities evaded charges through bribing and threatening various government authorities except the Internal Revenue Service. It was the very income activities and failure reporting opened a new corridor into criminal investigation. It validated auditing investigation as means identify reporting error from revealing deliberate criminal concealment activities.
The Tea party" a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt non-profit conservative political interest charges the IRS discrimination upon overtly aggressive and excessive auditing practices threatening member participation and funding. The charges legally inquires, if the IRS actions were warranted or willful denial civil law revealing political corruption motivated attack by opposing political interest parties. The looming threat a few agency officers compromised the IRS's merit enabling actions and legal authority without censor. These legal charges detrimental mar the IRS's auditing investigations practices and compromise integrity contention exposing: criminal funding, corporate corruption and terrorism funding.
The Tea Party's legal charges warrant enormous attention despite Congress and House limited comment suppressing media attention. Under legal dispute, The Tea Party has legitimately succeed a democratic coup propose identification and isolation political corruption from all IRS audit investigations. This single legal dispute pending judicial decision enforces constitutional civil liberties and rectifies IRS corruption neutrality practices for expanding U.S. terrorism audit investigation funding. The significance this impacts all U.S. global corporations, organizations and sub-government divisions avail obstruct U.S. government policies through deliberate and inadvertent corruption funding: political officials, organized crime or terrorist networks for internal or foreign affairs. The Tea Party's legal tort immediately addresses necessity, which the U.S. government misappropriation trillions of dollars both domestic and international affairs.
The IRS registers and reports various non-profits for status tax-exempt. This enables organizations flexibility diverting income revenue funding government as they provide beneficial civic and social welfare service gaps of the U.S. government. All non-profits fall under the umbrella term 501(c); either charity enabling donor contributions amounts deducted from personal income reporting or non-profit interest or service groups that donors contributions invalid personal tax deductions. This has been the "bone of discriminating contention" 501(c) organizations charities as transparent and non-deductible non-profits discretion.
Charities garner their donor tax-exempt status as they're funding activities voluntarily are administrated without any reservation civil/social status (age, race, gender, economic, religion or geographic region) towards the public and income revenue validated by the same private donor publicly. This creates a complete transparency of public trust. Therefore this two-fold action open funds use reporting and private contribution declaration defines these donors as public donors. Whether a donor validates contribution is purely voluntary and still voluntarily remain anonymous as no obligation requirement of them.
Seldom are their activities or actions imply ideas for reservation neither public or government threat. The IRS efforts reporting charity organizations are easily attributed public validation. Individuals openly document their identity and contribution amounts with 501(c) charities as rewarding action that imposes doing so. Rarely, charity activities scrutinized as they compliment government's civic ans social welfare. Whether a donor validates contributions is purely voluntary exercising their right not accepting personal tax exemptions and remain anonymous without question.
Non-Profit 501(c)
Non-For-Profit 501(c)'s garner their private voluntary funding without donor's exemption incentives as they're funds oblige civic and social welfare are administrated with specific reservation or limited recipients. Basis a non-profits role tax-exemption status is the government's civic and social welfare gap distribution under these reserved or limited recipients needs. Since these non-profits serves uniquely specific civic or social welfare recipients normally not satisfy role public organization nor satisfy private contributors as completely public donors. These non-profits address alleviating disadvantage towards specific civic/social status groups or interests.
They're roles towards civic and social welfare are often equality, protection and advancement all of which positive service government obligations and societies needs. Non-profits private donors identity and interests remain privately with-held except monetary funding amounts reported anonymously and beneficiaries receipt reported anonymous except indirect means of fund use or volume recipients. There exists no incentive declaring contributors identities and therefore no obligating requirement reporting contributors identity or association validating contribution funds. Nothing dictates nor dissuades individual rights of anonymous charitable investment.
Vigilante Reporting And Protecting Civil Liberty Rights of 501(c)
Often the right membership and association is divulged as voluntarily option as no obligation requirement or law dissuades voluntary anonymous funding nor force individuals rights of which, where or amount charitable investment. Due anonymous nature scrutiny and suspicion common instigates validity servicing positive government or society needs. Often this same indifference creates hostility and necessity anonymity. One feature the founding father's devised sheltered the government's freedoms, liberties and governments overthrown was voluntary participation of it's citizens.
Though not all 501(c) entities are openly public charities they still service government and social welfare. The IRS tax exemption status reinforces the U.S. founding principles sheltering. Why this is important one must think the trusts 501(c) serve:
Religion - Churches, Synagogues and Mosques file under a 501(c)
Gender and Age- Women and children social welfare groups file under a 501(c)
Race - NACCP and other promotion genderequality or aid file under a 501(c)
Political Interest Groups - file under a 501(c)
Environmental groups - Sierra Club, Wildlife trust & etc file under a 501(C)
Labor and Employment groups - Unions, Co-operatives and Work or Start-up support file under a 501(c)
Medical, Education & Arts or Preservation Libraries - vast requiems education arts and sciences
And, the list goes on various non-profit organizations....The issue is beyond their reports of income but direct list of supporting contributors. The IRS demanded this and the Tea Party held firm the desire contributors desire to remain anonymous. Most individuals choose anonymity as not exposing self toward personal attack for their support or interests equality. NACCP legally argued this as attacks occur against supporters common during the civil rights movement. Global history provides evidence hate crimes either race, religion, culture or etc. Today, as information becomes more accessible enabling individuals or groups identity revealed personal views such as choice religion, political or social welfare interests displayed for open attack reckless endangerment if they reserve choice anonymity against discrimination.
- The question what purpose knowing ones political stance serve the IRS?
- The question why not the same interest upon the Democratic and Republican seeking corruption investigations?
No comments:
Post a Comment